Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Landmark Case

In a 6-3 decision, the Justices affirmed that children born in the U.S. to parents unlawfully present or temporarily present in the U.S. are citizens at birth.
Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Landmark Case

The Supreme Court ruled that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens at birth.

The case challenged Executive Order 14160, which President Trump signed on January 20, 2025. That order stated that these children were not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and thus, not entitled to U.S. citizenship. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, ruled that children born on U.S. soil to such parents are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.

This 6-3 decision, issued on June 30, affirms a New Hampshire District Court decision that had previously blocked implementation of the executive order nationwide. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, and Jackson joined Roberts in the majority decision, with Justice Kavanaugh agreeing the order could not stand. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissented. 

The ruling leaves long-standing practice in place: a U.S. birth certificate remains proof of citizenship, and the Trump administration’s executive order imposing limitations on those born to parents unlawfully or temporarily in the United States is unlawful.

Share this article:
About the Author
Caryl Espinoza Jaen author photo
Caryl Espinoza Jaen
Staff Writer Caryl Espinoza Jaen is a Nicaraguan-born staff writer for Manifest Law. As a writer, he strives to cover complex topics like immigration policy with clarity, accuracy, and precision.
Take the First Step

    Take the First Step

    Please fill out your information to match with an attorney.

    +93



    *Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Manifest Law. As a result, any information you provide may not be protected by the attorney-client privilege or confidentiality. You understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and Manifest Law unless and until you sign a retention agreement with the firm. Your initial call may be with our intake specialists that is not an attorney and cannot provide you with legal advice.