Comparison

Manifest vs. Jackson Lewis: Comparing Corporate Immigration Law Firms in 2026

Choosing Between an Immigration Firm and a Workplace Law Firm

Written By:The Manifest Law Team

Reviewed By:Ana Gabriela Urizar

Published:

Manifest vs. Jackson Lewis: Comparing Corporate Immigration Law Firms in 2026

Representative image - not actual Manifest lawyer or client

Key Takeaways

  • Manifest is an immigration-only firm that publishes what it charges. Employment-based petitions, family matters, and extraordinary ability cases are the whole practice, priced as a per-case flat fee that covers email and calls.
  • Jackson Lewis is a workplace law firm with immigration as one practice. Its site states it has focused on employment and labor law since 1958, with 1,100+ attorneys in major cities nationwide, and its immigration group sits alongside I-9 audits, E-Verify counsel, and worksite enforcement representation.
  • The two firms disclose different amounts. Manifest publishes its pricing model, a two-chair legal review on published plans, and a Visa Approved or Money Back Guarantee for eligible corporate clients. Jackson Lewis does not publish standard U.S. legal fees, a case review process, or a guarantee.
  • Scale and specialization pull in different directions. A company that wants immigration handled inside an existing employment law relationship, or that expects I-9 enforcement exposure, is weighing something different from a company that wants case visibility, predictable per-case cost, and a firm that does immigration and nothing else.

Companies choosing immigration counsel usually land in one of two setups:

  1. A specialized practice that runs visas and Green Cards end to end, covering immigration alone.
  2. An immigration team tucked inside a bigger workplace law firm that is already handling the company’s HR policy, terminations, and labor disputes, with immigration as just one more line item.

Manifest Law and Jackson Lewis P.C. sit on opposite sides of that line. Manifest is a dedicated specialist, while Jackson Lewis is primarily a labor and employment firm that has an immigration practice group. That’s what makes them useful to compare.

This guide covers practice scope, pricing disclosure, technology, case visibility, and each firm’s review processes. All data below is sourced from each firm's publicly available website, as of Aug. 6, 2026.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

*By clicking Submit and subscribing to our newsletter, you agree to the Manifest Terms and Privacy Policy.

At-a-Glance Comparison

All entries are drawn from each firm's own website, as of August 6, 2026. "Not published" means the firm does not publicly disclose this information.

CriterionManifest LawJackson Lewis P.C.
Practice focusImmigration only: employment-based, family, and extraordinary ability mattersEmployment and labor law since 1958; immigration is one practice group
Scale published3,000 clients served; 250+ corporate immigration programs supported; 11+ years of experience per lawyer on average1,100+ attorneys; offices in major cities nationwide
Immigration servicesCorporate programs, work visas, employment-based and family green cards, extraordinary ability petitions, compliance tracking, same-day candidate evaluationsNon-immigrant and immigrant visas in virtually all categories; I-9 compliance training, policy drafting and internal audits; E-Verify counsel; worksite enforcement representation; outbound transfers and consular assistance
Pricing modelPer-case flat fee; no charge for email; no charge for calls; transparent automated billingNot published
Money-back guaranteeVisa Approved or Money Back Guarantee, offered case by case for corporate clients, subject to availabilityNot published
Case review process2-chair legal review on published plans; on select plans, petitions reviewed by former USCIS officers before filingNot published
Technology platformCentralized case management platform with a real-time dashboard, HRIS and ATS integration, and in-portal messaging between employees and attorneysPathWay VIA JL, described as automated immigration case management with real-time updates and reporting tools

The pattern in the table is disclosure rather than capability. Both firms file the same petition types. What differs is how much each one commits to in public about cost, review, and accountability, which is much of what a buyer is trying to compare.

Manifest Law

Manifest Law is a technology-enabled immigration law firm handling employment-based, family, and extraordinary ability matters for businesses and individuals. Immigration is the entire practice, so the firm is organized around visa and Green Card work. Its site reports 3,000 clients served and 250+ corporate immigration programs supported, with 11+ years of experience per lawyer on average.

The firm is specific about pricing. Corporate work is quoted as a per-case flat fee with transparent automated billing.

The firm states there is no charge for email and no charge for calls. Published plans carry what the firm calls a 2-chair legal review.

On select plans a former USCIS officer reviews the petition to pressure-test it before filing. A Visa Approved or Money Back Guarantee is offered to corporate clients on a case by case basis, subject to availability, with full terms published on the firm's site.

The firm also maintains an Insights & Government Relations team that tracks policy and regulatory developments. Its advisory bench includes former USCIS and DHS officials, among them a former USCIS Director and a former DHS Principal Director for Immigration Policy. For companies running a standing program, the Established Programs tier adds a centralized dashboard covering the whole foreign national population, HRIS and ATS integration, and a dedicated AI-native paralegal who configures the compliance dashboards and automates workflows during onboarding.

Manifest's strengths as a law firm are well-suited for: Companies that want immigration handled by a firm that does only immigration, with a per-case fee they can forecast, a published review process, and a dashboard their HR team can watch without emailing for status.

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Jackson Lewis P.C. states on its site that it has focused on employment and labor law since 1958, with 1,100+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide, and describes its work as helping employers develop proactive strategies and policies that reduce workplace law risk. The firm publishes Chambers USA recognition among its honors.

Its immigration practice covers non-immigrant and immigrant visa applications in virtually all visa categories, along with visa and employment authorization for transfers and new hires, and outbound employee transfers with consular assistance. The practice is positioned close to the firm's enforcement and compliance work: I-9 compliance and employment eligibility verification training, I-9 corporate policy drafting, I-9 internal audits and compliance risk assessments, E-Verify counsel, and representation in immigration investigations and worksite enforcement matters.

On technology, the firm names PathWay VIA JL, which it describes as automated immigration case management providing real-time updates and reporting tools. Jackson Lewis does not publish standard U.S. legal fees, a documented petition review process, or any form of outcome guarantee on its website.

How the Two Firms Compare on What Matters Most

Jackson Lewis has more attorneys than Manifest by an order of magnitude. Roughly 44 of its 1,100-plus attorneys sit in the immigration group.

Where Immigration Sits in the Firm

At Jackson Lewis, immigration is one group inside a workplace law firm. An I-9 audit that turns into an enforcement action, or a reduction in force that affects sponsored employees, touches both practices. Having them under one roof avoids coordinating two firms.

At Manifest, immigration is the whole business. There is no employment litigation or labor relations practice to route work through. The trade-off runs both ways: Jackson Lewis advertises I-9 audits and worksite enforcement representation as part of its immigration practice, while Manifest's operation focuses on a steady flow of petitions.

Pricing Transparency

Jackson Lewis does not publish standard U.S. legal fees. Scope and rates are set through the engagement.

Manifest’s model is a per-case flat fee with automated billing, correspondence included. The difference lands on whoever owns the budget.

A per-case fee lets a finance team forecast immigration spend against hiring plans. A fee that includes correspondence can make an HR team more comfortable asking questions.

Technology and Case Visibility

Both firms publish a case management system. Jackson Lewis names PathWay VIA JL and describes automated case management with real-time updates and reporting tools.

Manifest runs on proprietary case management software purpose-built for immigration rather than a licensed third-party tool. HR and mobility teams track progress, manage documents, and monitor status and deadlines for the entire foreign national population from one dashboard.

The platform integrates with a company's existing HRIS and ATS, which automates case initiation and document collection and lands same-day candidate evaluations in the applicant tracking system. Employees message their attorney inside the portal instead of routing questions through HR.

Accountability on the Petition

This is where the published record diverges. Manifest includes a two-chair legal review on its published plans. On select plans, a former USCIS officer reviews the filing before it goes out, which puts a second and sometimes third set of eyes on the evidentiary record.

Jackson Lewis does not publish a case review process.

Build a Smarter Immigration Program With Manifest

The choice here turns on which shape of relationship fits the problem. A company whose immigration work is inseparable from its employment litigation and labor matters has a real reason to keep everything with a workplace law firm.

But if a company’s problems include a queue of petitions, a lack of visibility into case status, and unpredictable legal bills, Manifest is built to solve those problems. Immigration is its only practice, it charges fees per case, and it has a published review process.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Manifest big enough to run our sponsorship program?

Manifest supports 250+ corporate immigration programs. Because it practices only immigration, its capacity sits entirely in the work a sponsorship program generates, where a firm with 1,100+ attorneys across its full range of practice areas devotes a fraction of that bench to immigration. The more useful question for a program of any size is how many active cases a company will have, who reviews each petition, and what the HR team can see without asking.

Is Manifest a real alternative to Jackson Lewis for a corporate immigration program?

For the immigration work itself, yes. Both firms file non-immigrant and immigrant petitions across the categories a corporate program uses. The difference is what surrounds it: Jackson Lewis brings an employment and labor practice and a published I-9 and worksite enforcement capability, while Manifest brings per-case flat pricing, a stated 2-chair legal review, HRIS and ATS integration, and a firm that does nothing but immigration. Companies weighing the incumbent field more broadly can also compare Manifest against Fragomen and BAL.

What does a labor and employment firm add that an immigration-only firm does not?

Adjacency. When an immigration matter overlaps an employment one, a firm with both practices can handle it without a second engagement. Jackson Lewis publishes I-9 compliance training, corporate policy drafting, internal audits and risk assessments, E-Verify counsel, and representation in investigations and worksite enforcement matters. Whether that adjacency matters depends on how much a company's immigration work intersects its employment work. A company whose immigration work stands on its own gets less from it.

At Manifest, licensed immigration attorneys handle the substantive work, and the firm's published plans include a 2-chair legal review before filing. On select plans, a former USCIS officer reviews the petition as well. Jackson Lewis does not publish how its immigration matters are staffed or reviewed, so a prospective client should ask who drafts the petition, who reviews it, and who they will speak to day to day.

Does Manifest charge for strategy calls or candidate evaluations?

No. Both sit inside the per-case fee, and Manifest's business immigration offering includes same-day candidate evaluations, which populate directly in the company's applicant tracking system for corporate clients.

How does Manifest's money-back guarantee work?

Manifest offers a Visa Approved or Money Back Guarantee to corporate clients on a case by case basis, subject to availability. Full terms are published in the money-back guarantee policy. Jackson Lewis does not publish a comparable guarantee.

Is Manifest a law firm or a technology platform?

A law firm. Manifest is a licensed immigration law firm whose attorneys are responsible for the legal work, and the platform is how that firm runs its cases, not a substitute for counsel. The distinction matters when comparing against providers that coordinate independent attorneys without being law firms themselves, because with a law firm the engagement carries the attorney-client relationship and its protections.

How long does it take to switch immigration firms?

Switching does not restart pending cases. New counsel files a Form G-28, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Accredited Representative, for each pending case. USCIS recognizes only one entry of appearance at a time, so a properly completed G-28 from a new firm terminates the prior firm's representation on that case, and USCIS then sends notices to the new firm alongside the client. Existing deadlines do not move: an RFE or NOID response window runs from the notice and cannot be extended. What varies is how organized the handover is, so the practical step is to ask a prospective firm how it handles transitions, what it needs from the outgoing provider, and how quickly the company's active caseload will be visible in its system.

Disclaimer. This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it, or contacting Manifest Law through this site, does not create an attorney-client relationship. Information about other firms is taken from each firm's publicly available website as of August 6, 2026, and may be incomplete or out of date; confirm current services, fees, and details directly with each firm. Manifest Law is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any other firm named here. Immigration law changes frequently, and the information here is current only as of the publication date. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This communication is attorney advertising.

About the Author

Reviewed By

Ana Gabriela Urizar
Ana Gabriela Urizar

Immigration Lawyer to Manifest Law

Ana Gabriela Urizar is an award-winning immigration attorney licensed in Arizona and New York. With nearly a decade of experience, she advises global corporations on complex U.S. immigration matters. Originally from Guatemala, Ana Gabriela previously spent close to ten years at the world’s largest immigration firm, managing business immigration matters for leading technology, science, and financial companies. She has been recognized by Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch (2027) and Negocios Now’s Tri-State 40 Under 40.

Read bio
Manifest architectural detail

/LET'S BEGIN

Let's Build a Case For
Your Future.

We help you figure it out. Then we work tirelessly to achieve your immigration goals.