Key Takeaways
- An EB-1A RFE is not a denial but a request for more information, often triggered by the final merits determination.
- RFEs can result from officer workload, limited expertise, or unclear presentation of evidence in your petition.
- Strong storytelling, context, and well-organized evidence increase your chances of approval and reduce confusion for officers.
- Refiling may be better than responding when major gaps exist, while proactive steps like updated achievements and premium processing help prevent RFEs.
An EB-1A Request for Evidence (RFE) is a written notice from USCIS asking for additional documentation or an explanation before deciding your petition.
“One of the main reasons people get an RFE is that the USCIS officer doesn’t believe you’ve fully met the EB-1A standard: proving you’ve risen to the very top of your field and achieved sustained national or international acclaim,” says Evan Law, immigration attorney at Manifest Law and former USCIS officer.
If you receive an RFE, you’re either missing evidence or need to provide more persuasive evidence, showing not just that you’ve achieved, but that your achievements are widely recognized, influential, and sustained.
The good news is that an RFE doesn’t mean your case is over. It’s an opportunity to sharpen your narrative, strengthen your evidence, and show USCIS why your impact is undeniable.
What is a Request for Evidence (RFE)?
A request for evidence (RFE) is a document from USCIS that tells you they need more proof or details before they can decide to approve or deny your case. The RFE explains what’s missing and gives you a deadline to respond with the additional information and documentation.
Subscribe to our newsletter.
*By clicking Submit and subscribing to our newsletter, you agree to the Manifest Terms and Privacy Policy.
What can cause or trigger an EB-1A RFE?
An EB-1A visa is for people who’ve demonstrated extraordinary ability in science, the arts, education, business, or athletics. Proving you’re eligible for the EB-1A requires meeting specific criteria as established by USCIS, plus passing the final merits determination.
Final merits determination is the final “gut check” that USCIS officers use when reviewing EB-1A petitions. After you’ve proven you meet at least three of the official EB-1A criteria, USCIS looks at your achievements as a whole to decide if they show you’re truly at the top of your field on a national or international level.
Your application for an EB-1A visa may trigger an RFE if the USCIS officer assigned to your case doesn’t believe that the evidence you provided satisfies the requirements that go toward showing you have sustained national or international acclaim. The RFE might also be because the USCIS officer isn’t sure your petition can pass the final merits determination.
Evan Law, a former USCIS officer and Manifest immigration attorney, says that EB-1A RFEs can specifically be triggered by mistakes such as:
- Relying too heavily on evidence that doesn’t fully meet the criteria used to establish sustained acclaim
- Submitting achievements that feel generic or unrelated to the field you claim
- Listing accomplishments without connecting them to industry impact
- Leaving gaps that make it unclear what establishes you as an expert in the field, and how your recognition is national or international
- Providing a large volume of evidence without enough of an explanation of its quality or significance
- Salary data, awards, or critical or leading role evidence without comparison points or proof of influence
- Filings that are hard to follow, such as those with unlabeled exhibits and missing translations, or that lack a table of contents
Can you get approved after an EB-1A RFE? One Manifest client’s story
A Manifest client in the accounting and management consulting field—an area where “extraordinary ability” is often misunderstood—received an EB-1A RFE that questioned nearly every aspect of her petition. Specifically, USCIS asked for stronger evidence of high salary, originality, and leadership.
The key to winning was not adding more documents, but reframing what she already had. Manifest’s experienced attorneys worked with her to:
- Clarify her niche and contrast her contributions with what peers in her field typically do
- Add independent expert opinions to explain why her work mattered on an industry level
- Layer her evidence with context, showing not just her position but why her role created measurable impact
- Present adoption rates, policy influence, and financial outcomes tied to third-party sources
Her petition was approved shortly after the RFE response by presenting her evidence in a clearer, more persuasive story.
Want to see what a strong EB-1A case looks like? Check out our EB-1A visa examples to see how researchers, founders, and creatives built successful petitions—and what made their stories stand out.
4 ways to respond to an EB-1A RFE and bolster your case
You typically have just 87 days to respond to an EB-1A RFE, including the time it takes for you to receive the RFE in the mail. To build your case and reduce the risk of a denial, it’s critical to respond quickly, thoroughly, and strategically.
Here’s how attorneys at Manifest Law, including Principal Immigration Attorney Nicole Gunara, would typically approach responding to an EB-1A RFE:
1. Strengthen the final merits determination narrative
Meeting the USCIS criteria only partially proves your eligibility for the EB-1A visa, because the officer also weighs your whole record in a final merits determination. You need to prove that your recognition isn’t fleeting or limited to your employer—it’s sustained, national or international in scope, and tied to your lasting impact on the field. That’s why the strongest RFE responses (and EB-1A petitions) connect every piece of evidence back to the bigger picture.
Remember, the USCIS officer isn’t just checking whether you’ve done impressive things—they want to see how those things have been recognized and understand why they mattered to your field or industry. That might look like citations or peer-reviewed publications in science, major exhibitions or critical reviews in the arts, influential teaching or curriculum development in education, widespread adoption of your products and methods, and measurable impact in business.
2. Upgrade your letters of recommendation
The strongest testimonials and EB-1A recommendation letters come from leaders with recognized stature in your field, such as journal editors, senior researchers, executives, or award committee members. When responding to an EB-1A RFE, consider adding expert opinions from these kinds of independent third parties.
Unlike traditional recommendation letters, these opinions should come from people who haven’t directly worked with you but can credibly contextualize your impact. This helps bridge the gap between technical evidence and the officer’s understanding of your extraordinary ability and sustained acclaim.
3. Improve the structure and organization of your evidence
In any given day, USCIS officers review thousands of pages of evidence across many petitions. The easier you make it for them to find the evidence they need to understand your case, the better.
When putting together your RFE response, be sure to include a detailed table of contents and organize exhibits by theme. Then, cross-reference them in your cover letter. For example: “See Exhibit D-3 at page 4” directs the officer straight to the relevant evidence.
4. Showcase intangibles and community involvement
Not every achievement fits neatly into USCIS categories. Invited talks, leadership on industry panels, nonprofit mentorship, and open-source contributions all demonstrate recognition and influence. These intangibles help officers “feel” that you are at the top of your field.
“The officer is usually looking for outside affirmations of you being incredible… Things that show your stature in the community but might not fit precisely into the defined USCIS criteria,” says Nicole Gunara, Principal Immigration Attorney at Manifest Law.
When to refile instead of responding to an EB-1A RFE
Sometimes an RFE is more than a request for missing pieces. It can reflect that the officer reviewing your case doesn’t believe you qualify for the extraordinary ability classification. You’ll often see it in the tone of the letter, such as if it brushes off strong evidence or repeats the same doubts even when you’ve addressed them directly in your materials.
In those situations, responding to the RFE isn’t always the best use of your time. Instead, you may want to consider re-filing your EB-1A petition. This puts your petition in front of a different USCIS officer and gives you the chance to present your record with stronger framing and updated evidence—instead of trying to change the mind of someone who may already have decided they don’t believe you’re qualified.
“Sometimes it’s better to refile than respond. This is for those instances when you really feel like they are just coming at you with everything. For example, if you get an RFE in an EB-1 case, and they say you haven’t shown that you meet any of the criteria, and they give you 10 reasons for each one … you’re fighting such an uphill battle that it may just be a good time to look at refiling,” says former USCIS officer and Manifest immigration attorney Evan Law.
It’s important to note, however, that re-filing your EB-1A petition restarts the clock and can add many months of waiting to your timeline. If timing is a concern, it’s best to consult with an experienced immigration attorney before deciding how to proceed with your EB-1A RFE.
EB-1A RFE approval rates: what the data shows
USCIS doesn’t publish how many EB-1A petitions are approved after an RFE, so there is no official EB-1A RFE approval rate. The closest official figure is the overall EB-1A approval rate, which fell to 32.2% in the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2026, down from about 66.9% across Fiscal Year 2025. See current EB-1A approval rate data for the full quarter-by-quarter breakdown.
RFEs themselves are common. In the case-tracking platform Lawfully’s February 2026 report, 49% of the regularly processed EB-1A petitions in its sample drew an RFE. That figure comes from a limited sample rather than from USCIS, so treat it as a trend line, not an official rate.
Because the overall approval rate counts every petition, strong and weak, it says little about any single case. What matters more for yours is how directly your response answers the specific concerns in your RFE, and, as the client story above shows, a well-framed response can still end in approval.
Webinar: Ex-USCIS Officer explains RFEs
Looking for a deeper dive into EB-1A and EB-2 NIW RFEs? Evan Law recently hosted a Manifest Law webinar all about RFEs, from what triggers them to how to reduce the risk of receiving one. Watch the full webinar below.
This YouTube video is hidden until you accept functional cookies.
For EB-1A applicants, an RFE is a second chance, not the end
An RFE can feel like an impossible obstacle, but it’s really an invitation to strengthen your case. USCIS is asking for more—and that gives you the chance to step back, clarify your story, and present your achievements in a way that resonates with an adjudicating officer.
If you are worried about an RFE on your EB-1A case, or you have already received one, request a free consultation with Manifest Law's EB-1 attorneys. The USCIS approval rate for EB-1A petitions is 32.2%**, while our experienced co-counsels average 97%* on EB-1A cases. Across all three EB-1 categories, USCIS approved 67.9% of petitions in the same quarter, because EB-1B and EB-1C are approved at far higher rates than EB-1A.
*Disclaimer: Average historical approval rate provided by Manifest co-counsel in connection with cases handled with Manifest and co-counsel's prior firms.
**According to approval data from USCIS in FY 2026 Q3
Frequently Asked Questions
Will an RFE set back my EB-1A Green Card timeline?
An RFE doesn’t mean your Green Card journey is over. It simply means USCIS wants additional evidence before making a decision. If you respond strategically, an RFE can be an opportunity to clarify your achievements and strengthen your petition.
Can EB-1A premium processing increase the chance of an RFE?
There’s no evidence that premium processing increases your chances of an RFE. When you upgrade an EB-1A application to premium processing, USCIS has only 15 business days to complete adjudication, but nothing can guarantee that you will or will not receive an RFE. An experienced immigration attorney can help you build a petition that makes your eligibility clear, and respond quickly if an RFE arrives anyway.
Do I need an immigration lawyer to respond to an RFE?
A skilled RFE-response lawyer translates technical achievements into clear arguments USCIS can follow. They know how to connect achievements, whether those are scholarly articles, leadership positions, or published material, to meet the final merits standard. With years of experience, an immigration attorney can guide you on whether to respond or refile, and give you legal advice that’s specific to your field of expertise.
What is the best immigration lawyer for an EB-1A RFE?
Look for a lawyer with specific EB-1A RFE experience, ideally with insight into how USCIS officers adjudicate these petitions, since your response has to answer the officer’s exact concerns. Manifest’s EB-1 visa lawyers include former USCIS officer Evan Law, who is quoted throughout this guide.
Is an RFE common for EB-1A petitions?
Yes. RFEs are a routine part of EB-1A adjudication, and private case-tracking data suggests close to half of regularly processed petitions receive one; see the RFE approval rate section above for what that data does and doesn’t tell you.
About the Author

Contributing Writer
Nupur Gambhir is a contributing writer at Manifest Law, where she turns complex visa info into clear, no-fluff guidance for people starting a new chapter in the U.S. She’s all about making the immigration process less overwhelming and more human.
Read bioReviewed By

Princ. Immigration Attorney
Nicole is the founding legal architect and an immigration attorney with extensive experience across extraordinary ability, employment-based, and investment visas. As the founding legal architect, Nicole helped shape the engine of Manifest Law to serve our clients as effectively and strategically as possible.
Read bioShare this article:











