Under New Proposal, USCIS May Deny Green Cards to Immigrants Using Public Benefits

If implemented, immigration officers could deem immigrants benefiting from food, healthcare, and housing assistance as inadmissible.
Under New Proposal, USCIS May Deny Green Cards to Immigrants Using Public Benefits

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services may begin denying Green Card applications from people who’ve received any form of social welfare benefits in the past. 

On November 19, the Department of Homeland Security proposed that immigration officers should have greater power to deny permanent residency to noncitizens who use public benefit programs. If implemented, USCIS could deem immigrants benefiting from food, healthcare, and housing assistance as inadmissible. 

Ana Gabriela Urizar, immigration attorney at Manifest, says the proposal gives officers more power to deny immigration benefits to immigrants from lower-income communities. 

“If USCIS applies this rule retroactively, it could have serious consequences for thousands of immigrants who relied on public benefits legally and in good faith,” Urizar says. “Clear guidance and fair implementation will be critical to prevent denials.”

Public charge rule may return if proposal passes

The Immigration and Nationality Act already allows immigration officers to deny benefits to noncitizens whom they believe may rely on government aid in the future. USCIS first expanded that policy under the first Trump administration, making a person who received social welfare benefits — defined by law as a “public charge” — inadmissible.

These public benefits include nutrition assistance under SNAP, healthcare through Medicaid, and housing assistance.

In 2022, the Biden administration reduced that policy, telling immigration officers not to consider past reliance and narrowing the definition of government aid. But under the new proposed rule, USCIS would allow immigration officers to use “good judgment and discretion” to deny immigration benefits to people they deem a public charge. 

Proposed rule may not take effect until December 19 at the earliest

Right now, people have until December 19 to submit written comments on DHS’s proposed rule. After the federal agency reviews the comments, it then has the option to amend, rescind, or implement the proposal as a final rule. 

Until then, those applying for Green Cards or other immigration benefits should not expect to see changes. In the meantime, Urizar recommends that people stay informed, review their public benefit history with an attorney, and avoid making assumptions about how the rule might affect their case until the final guidance is published.

Applying for a Green Card soon? Our team of immigration lawyers can guide you through the application process and what to expect if you’ve received government aid in the past. Book a consultation today to learn more.

Share this article:
About the Author
Caryl Espinoza Jaen author photo
Caryl Espinoza Jaen
Staff Writer Caryl Espinoza Jaen is a Nicaraguan-born staff writer for Manifest Law. As a writer, he strives to cover complex topics like immigration policy with clarity, accuracy, and precision.
Take the First Step

    Take the First Step

    Please fill out your information to match with an attorney.

    +93



    *Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Manifest Law. As a result, any information you provide may not be protected by the attorney-client privilege or confidentiality. You understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and Manifest Law unless and until you sign a retention agreement with the firm. Your initial call may be with our intake specialists that is not an attorney and cannot provide you with legal advice.